Evaluation: "Do you like apples? Well how do you like them apples?"
The rubric below will be what I use to grade your work. Please check in and reflect on what I am looking for to ensure that you will like your grade and "them apples."
|
Criteria
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Clarity |
The overall goal of the project is incomprehensible |
Only the very basics of the project can be seen through the team’s work |
Some, but not all, of the goal is clearly demonstrated through the material turned in for the team |
The overall goal of the project is clear and easily identifiable through the material the team created |
|
Teamwork |
No collaboration of the team |
Minimal collaboration to complete project |
Most members of the team contributed and worked together to complete the project |
Every member of the team worked well together in order to accomplish the goal successfully |
|
History |
No history is included |
Some history is included but with little or no direction |
Howard Zinn and history are prominent throughout the outline but show little focus |
Howard Zinn’s work in expressing unique interpretations of historical events flow throughout the context of the outline |
|
Connection |
The second movie does not flow at all with the first |
Minimal steps have been taken to create a transition between the two movies |
While most areas of the second movie transition smoothly from the first, there are still a few critical areas that do not flow |
All areas in the outline show a smooth transition from the first movie to the second |
|
Drama |
No elements of drama were worked with |
No explanation or in-depth use of dramatic elements |
Good use of dramatic elements but not thorough |
Great use of dramatic elements that shows knowledge and depth in the enriching of film through the elements |
|
Geography |
Geography and context are never considered |
Geography is considered but not in context |
Geography and context are considered but does not show critical attributes in relation to the movie |
The outline proves that the geography for the filming has been kept in context of the movie and demonstrates the critical attributes geography has on film |
|
Writing |
Writing is sloppy with extremely poor grammar |
Writing carries many errors |
Writing for the most part is grammatically correct, but still holds a few major mistakes |
Writing looks flawless, shows revision and time spent, shows upper level writing skills |
|
Creativity |
Idea is completely unoriginal |
Idea copies much of the first theme |
Idea shows expansion but still narrowed to the first film |
Idea is completely original and creative, yet connects perfectly with the first movie |
Continue on with more steps on the Process page.